Assembling a 40" Topsky discus
launch glider (dlg)
The Topsky is a 40" dlg with a glass
fuselage and blue foam vacuum bagged glass covered wings. It is imported from
Hong Kong and distributed by Hyperflight. The makers of the kit quote that the
ready to fly weight is 150gm and Hyperflight claim 138gm. Measurements of the
kit contents prior to build gave an estimated target of 157gm with a wing
loading of 12.9gm/dm^2. This was felt to be heavier than I wished to fly at, so
I had a close look at ways to lose some weight.
- Pod
.. I decided
to epoxy the wings onto the pod so drilled out the captive nuts. This is not a
radical modification, contest free flight dlg's have their wings attached with
epoxy . The saving was 3.3 gms. The 1mm holes are to help to key the wing. The
following 2 pictures show before and after views of the pod.
Before
After
- Control snakes
..The kit was
supplied with teflon snakes and 0.8mm steel wire for operation of the rudder
and elevator. These were 6.8gm in total. They were discarded in favour of a
Kevlar pull string and torsion bar. The weight of these replacement components
was 0.1gm. The decision was made to run rudderless. The torsion bar was made
from a length of top E string .008" in diameter, 55mm between centres.
- Rudder and
elevator
as supplied, these were made from 2.5mm balsa, were
not shaped and were glassed. A combined weight of 9.8gm consigned them to the
scrap box. The rudder was remade in 2.5mm balsa, shaped by eye and hinged with
Blenderm just in case I needed to change my mind. This weighed 1.95gm after 3
coats of talc/50/50dope. I could have repeated this for the elevator but found
a spare Elf tail (3.2gm) which I converted from all moving to hinged
elevator
.much stiffer than all moving.
- The horns and clevis supplied were
on the porky side so were replaced with 0.8mm ply and 0.8mm wire with 0.35mm
piano wire keepers. The servo mounting plate was discarded. I did polish the
boom for 10mins or so but soon got fed up with the mess it made and stopped
before I covered the work area in fine carbon powder.
- Wing
..since I
discarded bolted wing connections, than a further 2.6 gms was lost by
discarding the wing bolt screws. You will also notice the hole dug out in the
rear of the fuselage. This was for the hidden aileron torque rods as balance
calculations show that wing mounted aileron servos as per the plan would not
give a balance without added nose weight. This saved the 1.9gm of the aileron
plug and extended servo leads
..and I do not have to fiddle about digging
material out of the wings to mount the servos as they are epoxy mounted in the
middle of the pod without the ply servo mount. The advantage is a clean
exterior with no external horns or pushrods and something to get hold of if you
fancy a javelin throw. Only the top surface of the wings were joined with glass
cloth as the bottom surface was supported by the fuselage flanges.
These modifications reduced the
fuselage weight from 48.9 to 30.2 gm , a saving of 18.7gm or 38.2% and the wing
lost a further 4.4gms. Overall the weight of the bare airframe reduced from an
estimated 121.2gm to an estimated 98.1gm. In practice, this came out to an
actual 99.7gm. Perhaps I was overgenerous with the glue.
The following table shows in detail
the weight of the components before and after modification. Modified items
are highlighted.
TopSky mini |
Before
mod |
After
mod |
|
(gm) |
(gm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pod |
20 |
16.7 |
Hatch |
0.8 |
0.8 |
Stab |
6.1 |
3.2 |
Fin |
3.7 |
2 |
Boom |
5.4 |
5.2 |
Servo tray |
1.7 |
0.3 |
Teflon snakes |
2.1 |
0 |
P/rod wire |
4.7 |
0.1 |
Horns/clevis |
2.6 |
0.5 |
Tail mount |
0.8 |
0.4 |
Glue |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
Wing screws |
2.6 |
0 |
AIL prods |
0.8 |
0.8 |
AIL torq rods |
0 |
1.5 |
Wing R |
31.4 |
31.4 |
Wing L |
31.6 |
31.6 |
Throw peg |
0.8 |
0.8 |
Glue |
0.8 |
0.8 |
Wing plug |
1.9 |
0 |
Carbon / Glass |
2.4 |
1 |
Fuselage and wing sub totals are as
below
.
|
|
Before
mod |
After
mod |
Saving |
Saving |
|
|
(gm) |
(gm) |
(gm) |
(%) |
Predicted |
Fuselage sub total |
48.9 |
30.2 |
18.7 |
38.2 |
Predicted |
Wing sub total |
72.3 |
67.9 |
4.4 |
6.1 |
Predicted |
Airframe weight less
radio |
121.2 |
98.1 |
23.1 |
- |
Actual |
Airframe weight less
radio |
- |
99.7 |
- |
- |
Clearly the 6 gms saved by remaking
the stab, fin and discarding the steel pushrods would reflect an 18-20gm nose
weight to obtain a balance as my installation placed all the avionics as far
forward as possible. Flying weight would be the wrong side of 170gm. I am very
glad that I took the decision to save rear end weight. The reduced weight fin
is flimsy and considered to be expendable.
- Avionics
.The
ailerons were driven by a pair of DS49 servos, wrapped in masking tape and
epoxied to the floor of the pod. These were mounted in line. The elevator servo
(Blue Arrow 3.5gm) was mounted on top of the aileron servos and the Kevlar pull
line can just be seen on the right. The RX is a 7gm MPX RX5 run by a 350mah 1s
Lipo with 2mm bullet connectors. Weight of the radio gear was 36.2gms giving a
flying weight of 135.9gm. The battery is twice as large as need be but 11gm was
required to balance the model and the 320mah battery was to hand at the correct
weight for balance.
Finally a view of the complete installation with the RX hidden
underneath the LiPo.
This is a robust mosquito size dlg
with a substantial glass fibre fuselage and a glassed vacuum bagged blue foam
wing which is easily repairable. It is not of the same quality as Vladimir's
Elf and takes 3 or 4 times the man-hours to assemble. It should however take
more abuse than the Elf. In its favour are a higher wing loading and hopefully
more precise roll control via the full length ailerons. A computer based TX
provides spoilers and elevator compensation for precise landings.
The Topsky was flown in 3-5mph at
Ferry along with a standard Elf. First impressions were that the Elf was not
happy in gusty conditions and was more difficult to fly accurately. The Topsky
has a much higher wing loading and therefore the glide was not as good as the
Elf but it offers flat thermal turns with predictable handling. At this point,
I prefer the Topsky as capable of flying without drama in a wider wind speed
range than the Elf and in an unfussy manner. This argues for aileron roll
control even at mosquito size 40" dlg's. The Topsky is quite happy on 1 cell
using about 35 mah per hour of battery capacity. I did not miss the rudder and
the wings are still attached to the fuselage.
Set up data for the MPX TX
was:-
The ailerons provide 3 functions,
ailerons, flaps and spoilers
1. Aileron setting +6mm/-1.5mm
2. Flaps -1.5mm, zero, +2mm for
launch, cruise, thermal on LH slider. EL compensation of -0.5mm, 0,
+0.3mm
3. Spoiler setting as much as I can
get, about 10mm down with 1mm EL compensation. This function on the TH
stick.
Additionally for launch I have 0.75mm
of down programmed into the LH momentary button using the MPX FIX function.
This is the control that the AEROBATS might use for push button rolls and
overrides all other settings.
EL settings are +5mm/-5mm.
Exponential and rates are not used.
This is a personal issue and not to everyone's taste.
Ian Middlemiss April 2014 [email protected] |